Sharing Options
- Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
- Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
- Click to print (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
Its a brave posting and I like that. I think we need more than one word for Loyalty it needs some nuanced sub divisions. There is Loyalty given because of history with a person or organisation – but typically (of an organisation) because of individual level interactions – gained loyalty if you like.
And [unthinking] Loyalty because the person or organisation in some way is felt to reflect or advance your values at National or Religious level downward. This is a self protective response under cover of perceived threat of change.
It is interesting that there is now some sense of a Global level identification cross cutting what have been to date the typically largest scale organisations (above) for something more amorphous connected with Climate Change (and of course the backlash from those who fear change who are more comfortable in denial of change as a possibility who find common cause in opposition)
I am wondering which studies you used for this claim. (I’m not disputing, I just like to look at the data)